(68%) children were not exposed. For exposure to parental nudity, vulnerability was more

normally dispersed so a 4-point constant measure was used. Failing points 2 and
3, 49 (25%) children were not exposed to any parental nudity, 86 (44%) (lads n = 41,
girls n = 46) were exposed with moderate frequency, and 61 (31%) kids (boys n = 34,
girls n = 27) were exposed frequently. nudism family pics for 7 children weren’t contained in the
Evaluations to follow due to unacceptable amounts of missing data.
Table IV shows the results for continuous outcome measures in the 18-year followup,
and Table V displays results for the binary variables.
There were no significant main effects of the predictor variables. A significant crossover
interaction indicated that for boys, vulnerability to primal scenes predicted reduced odds

of having gotten an STD, or having gotten someone pregnant. The reverse was the case
for girls, who were significantly more likely to have gotten an STD or to have become
pregnant [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1 OMITTED]. This finding was independent
of the extent of sexual behaviour participated in.
A number of trends were found that were significant at p [less than] 0.05, which was
above the cutoff point for value after the Bonferonni correction. Exposure to
parental nudity predicted lower chance of sex in [TABULAR DATA FOR
DATA FOR TABLE V OMITTED] adolescence, but more favorable sexual experiences
among that group of participants who were sexually active. Exposure to parental nudity
Additionally predicted reduced cases of petty theft and shoplifting, but this was mediated by a
sex of participant interaction indicating that this effect was attenuated or absent for
Girls. Similarly, exposure to parental nudity was associated at the degree of tendency with
reduced use of drugs including cannabis, LSD, Ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms, but
again, this effect was mediated by a significant sex of participant interaction suggesting
that this effect was experienced chiefly by guys. Really, endangered women were really
slightly more likely to have used these drugs.
At the level of tendency, exposure to primal scenes was correlated with higher amounts of
self-acceptance and improved relationships with adults other than parents. There was additionally a
Tendency for women exposed to primal scenes to have been less likely to use drugs such as
PCP, major tranquilizers, inhalants, and psychedelics apart from LSD or mushrooms.
Although a number of nonsignificant trends appeared for management variants, the only
Critical finding was that family sexual liberalism was correlated with sexual
liberalism at adolescence. Squared semipartial correlation coefficients for the predictor variables are
displayed in Table VI. In fkk naturist pageant [TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE VI OMITTED] instance was
explained variability greater than 5.7% and for most variants the figure was less than 1%.
This study, using a longitudinal design, is the first to analyze long-term correlates of
early childhood exposure to parental nudity and primal scenes. Consistent with the
cross-sectional retrospective literature (and with our expectations), no dangerous primary
effects of these experiences were found at age 17-18. Really, trends in the data that were
significant at p [less than] 0.05 but did not reach significance following the Bonferonni
correction demonstrated primarily favorable correlates of these two variables. Exposure to

parental nudity was associated with favorable, rather than negative, sexual experiences in
adolescence, but with decreased sexual experience general. Boys exposed to parental nudity
were less likely to have participated in larceny in adolescence or to have used various
psychedelic drugs and marijuana.

In the instance of of primal scenes, vulnerability was associated with improved relationships with adults
outside of the family and with higher levels of self-acceptance. Girls exposed to primal
scenes were also less likely to have used drugs like PCP, inhalants, or various
psychedelics in adolescence. The one note of caution was sounded by an important sex of
participant interaction suggesting that men’ exposure to primal scenes was related
with decreased risk of social “issues” associated with sexuality, while the reverse was
the case for females. Girls in our study who’d been exposed to primal scenes
reported increased cases of STD transmission and pregnancy. All findings were
independent of the effects of SES, sex of participant, family stability, pathology,
“pronaturalism,” and beliefs and attitudes toward sexuality.
Taken as a whole then, effects are few, but normally advantageous in nature. Thus, results of
this study add weight to the views of those people who have opposed alarmist depictions
of childhood exposure both to nudity and accompanying scenes of parental sexuality.
Additionally, although the organization of higher instance of sexually transmitted diseases